|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text : |
| The aim of this study was to identify the achievement standard of students’ learning performance based on learning assessment instruments for category invasion games in Year 4 Physical Education and compare the performance between urban school students and rural school students. The design of the study is pre experimental one-shot case study. The study used assessment for learning, assessment as learning and assessment of learning instruments. Teacher assessment and self-assessment methods were used to collect data that measure the achievement standard of students’ learning performance in psychomotor, cognitive and affective learning aspects among primary schools students in Hulu Selangor, Malaysia. The study found that the performance standard of students’ learning achievement of urban school students and rural school students were at "Good" performance standard for assessment for learning, assessment as learning and assessment of learning. The results also showed that there is no significant difference in the level of students’ learning performance standard among urban school students and rural school students in assessment for learning, assessment as learning and assessment of learning. It is concluded that the learning assessment instruments can be used by all teachers and students in assessing the achievement standard of students’ learning performance for category invasion games in Physical Education |
| References |
1. Atkin, J. M., Black, P., & Coffey, J. (2001). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan.
3. Collier, C., & O’Sullivan, M. (1997). Case method in physical education higher education. A pedagogy of change? Quest, 49, 198–213.
4. Crooks, T. J. (2002). Educational assessment in New Zealand schools. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9(2), 237–253.
5. Davies, A. (2011). Making classroom assessment work. 555 North Morton Street, Bloomington, IN 47404.: Solution Tree.
6. Desrosiers, P., Genet-Volet, Y., & Godbout, P. (1997). Teachers’ assessment practices viewed through the instruments used in physical education classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16(2), 211–228.
7. Doolittle, S. (1996). Practical Assessment for physical education teachers. Journal of Physical
Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(8), 35–37.
8. Earl, L. (2003). Assessment of Learning, for Learning, and as Learning. Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximise Student Learning. Retrieved from
http://archive.aacu.org/summerinstitutes/ild/documents/assessmentforofaslearning2003_learl.pdf
9. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2006). Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind: Assessment for Learning, Assessment as Learning, Assessment of Learning. Ness Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba: Crown.
10. Earl, L. M. (1998). Assessment for Learning ; Assessment as Learning : Changing Practices Means
Changing Beliefs. Assessment and Learning, 80(2), 2–6.
11. Gallo, A. M. (2003). Assessing the affective domain. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 74(4), 44–48.
12. Hopper, T. (2007). Teaching tennis with assessment for/as learning. Journal of Physical Health Education, 73, 1–11. Retrieved from http://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp?
13. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
14. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Surat Pekeliling Lembaga Peperiksaan Bil. 1/2014: Penambahbaikan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS). Putrajaya.
15. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Buku Panduan Pengurusan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS). Kuala Lumpur: Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.
16. Latta, M., Buck, G., & Beckenhauer, A. (2007). Formative Assessment Requires Artistic Vision.
International Journal of Education & Arts, 8(4), 1–22.
17. Matanin, M & Tannehill, D. (1994). Assessment and Grading in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 395–405.
18. Mercier, K., & Doolittle, S. (2013). Assessing Student Achievement in physical education for teacher evaluation. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84, 38–42.
Retrieved from http://ezproxy.usherbrooke.ca/login?
19. Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2008). Teaching physical education. 1st online edition.
20. Penney, D., Brooker, R., Hay, P., & Gillespie, L. (2009). Curriculum, pedagogy and assessment: Three message systems of schooling and dimensions of quality physical education. Sport, Education and Society. doi:10.1080/13573320903217125
21. Rodriguez, M. C. (2004). The Role of Classroom Assessment in Student Performance on TIMSS. Applied Measurement in Education, 17(1), 1–24. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1701
22. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
23. Stiggins, R. (2004). New Assessment Beliefs for a New School Mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 22–27.
24. Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using Student-Involved Classroom Assessment to Close Achievement Gaps. Theory Into Practice. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4401_3
25. Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Barriers to Effective Student Assessments. Education Digest, 64, 25–29.
26. Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 1–8. doi:10.2307/20440249
27. Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From Formative Assessment to Assessment FOR Learning: A Path to Success in Standards-Based Schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328.
28. Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post‐secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. 1. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–
294. doi:10.1080/09695940701591867
29. William, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers Developing Assessment for Learning: Impact on Student Achivement, Assessment in Education. Princple Policy And Practice, 11(1), 49–65.
30. Worrell, V., Evans-Fletcher, C., & Kovar, S. (2002). Assessing the cognitive and affective progress of children. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 73(7), 29–34. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |